CLLD Concepticon 3.1.0 -

Concept completeness [english]

Language	Gloss
English	completeness

Pos:: noun
Ids_in_source:: ['649:completeness-wholeness:0', '650:completeness-wholeness:0', '651:completeness-incompleteness:0', '652:completeness-fullness:0', '653:completeness-incompleteness:0', '654:completeness-emptiness:0']
Links:: ['→757', '→757', '→348', '→279', '→348', '→225']
Polysemy_class:: ['poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2']
Frequency_class:: ['freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed']
Degree_class:: ['HIGH', 'NOT', 'HIGH', 'LOW', 'NOT', 'LOW']
Relation_type:: ['SYN', 'ANT', 'ANT', 'SYN', 'SYN', 'ANT']
Forward_scores:: [4.5, 0.0, 5.0, 4.0, 0.0, 4.4]
Backward_scores:: [4.8, 0.0, 5.0, 3.9, 0.0, 4.4]

Concept set:: <NA>
Concept list:: Lapesa 2014 772; The database includes semantically related word pairs for English is based on [Scheible and Schulte im Walde (2014)](ContributionTable#cldf:Scheible-2014-1755). The ratings on similarity are based on human judgement experiments and comprise (i) a representative selection of target lexical units balanced for semantic category, polysemy, and corpus frequency, (ii) a set of human-generated semantically related word pairs based on the target units, and (iii) a subset of the generated word pairs rated for their relation strength, including positive and negative relation evidence.