CLLD Concepticon 3.2.0 -

Concept biblical [english]

Language	Gloss
English	biblical

Pos:: adjective
Ids_in_source:: ['10:biblical-historical:0', '11:biblical-religious:0', '12:biblical-secular:0', '13:biblical-scriptural:0', '14:biblical-secular:0', '15:biblical-religious:0', '16:biblical-religious:0', '17:biblical-unbiblical:0', '18:biblical-secular:0']
Links:: ['→316', '→543', '→584', '→582', '→584', '→543', '→543', '→691', '→584']
Polysemy_class:: ['poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2']
Frequency_class:: ['freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax', 'freqMax']
Degree_class:: ['LOW', 'HIGH', 'NOT', 'LOW', 'NOT', 'NOT', 'HIGH', 'LOW', 'HIGH']
Relation_type:: ['HYP', 'HYP', 'HYP', 'SYN', 'SYN', 'ANT', 'SYN', 'ANT', 'ANT']
Forward_scores:: [3.154, 4.6, 0.8, 4.0, 0.4, 0.3, 3.2, 5.0, 3.8]
Backward_scores:: [3.364, 4.75, 1.125, 4.6, 0.0, 0.2, 3.7, 5.0, 4.0]

Concept set:: <NA>
Concept list:: Lapesa 2014 772; The database includes semantically related word pairs for English is based on Scheible 2014 1755. The ratings on similarity are based on human judgement experiments and comprise (i) a representative selection of target lexical units balanced for semantic category, polysemy, and corpus frequency, (ii) a set of human-generated semantically related word pairs based on the target units, and (iii) a subset of the generated word pairs rated for their relation strength, including positive and negative relation evidence.