CLLD Concepticon 3.1.0 -

Concept catalogue [english]

Language	Gloss
English	catalogue

Pos:: verb
Ids_in_source:: ['295:to-catalogue-to-classify:0', '296:to-catalogue-to-disorganize:0', '297:to-catalogue-to-delist:0', '298:to-catalogue-to-organize:0', '299:to-catalogue-to-disorganize:0', '300:to-catalogue-to-list:0']
Links:: ['→108', '→198', '→170', '→463', '→198', '→401']
Polysemy_class:: ['poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2', 'poli2']
Frequency_class:: ['freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed', 'freqMed']
Degree_class:: ['NOT', 'NOT', 'LOW', 'HIGH', 'HIGH', 'LOW']
Relation_type:: ['ANT', 'HYP', 'ANT', 'HYP', 'ANT', 'HYP']
Forward_scores:: [0.0, 0.0, 4.9, 4.8, 4.3, 4.6]
Backward_scores:: [0.0, 0.0, 4.4, 4.4, 4.4, 4.8]

Concept set:: <NA>
Concept list:: Lapesa 2014 772; The database includes semantically related word pairs for English is based on [Scheible and Schulte im Walde (2014)](ContributionTable#cldf:Scheible-2014-1755). The ratings on similarity are based on human judgement experiments and comprise (i) a representative selection of target lexical units balanced for semantic category, polysemy, and corpus frequency, (ii) a set of human-generated semantically related word pairs based on the target units, and (iii) a subset of the generated word pairs rated for their relation strength, including positive and negative relation evidence.